feat: add OpenProse plugin skills
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
|
||||
# Content Creation Pipeline
|
||||
#
|
||||
# From idea to published content in one run. Researches a topic in parallel,
|
||||
# writes a blog post, refines it through editorial review, and generates
|
||||
# social media posts. Watch an entire content operation happen automatically.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Usage: Provide a topic and watch the content materialize.
|
||||
|
||||
input topic: "The topic to create content about"
|
||||
input audience: "Target audience (e.g., 'developers', 'executives', 'general')"
|
||||
|
||||
agent researcher:
|
||||
model: opus # Deep research requires reasoning
|
||||
skills: ["web-search"]
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
You are a research specialist. For any topic:
|
||||
1. Find authoritative sources
|
||||
2. Identify key facts and statistics
|
||||
3. Note interesting angles and hooks
|
||||
4. Cite your sources
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured research with citations.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
agent writer:
|
||||
model: opus # Writing is hard work
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
You are a skilled technical writer. You write:
|
||||
- Clear, engaging prose
|
||||
- Well-structured articles with headers
|
||||
- Content appropriate for the target audience
|
||||
- With a distinctive but professional voice
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid jargon unless writing for experts.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
agent editor:
|
||||
model: sonnet
|
||||
persist: true
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
You are a senior editor. You review content for:
|
||||
- Clarity and flow
|
||||
- Factual accuracy
|
||||
- Engagement and hook strength
|
||||
- Appropriate length and structure
|
||||
|
||||
Be constructive. Suggest specific improvements.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
agent social-strategist:
|
||||
model: sonnet
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
You create social media content. For each platform:
|
||||
- Twitter/X: Punchy, hooks, threads if needed
|
||||
- LinkedIn: Professional, insight-focused
|
||||
- Hacker News: Technical, understated, genuine
|
||||
|
||||
Match the culture of each platform. Never be cringe.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 1: Parallel research from multiple angles
|
||||
session "Research phase starting for: {topic}"
|
||||
|
||||
parallel:
|
||||
core_research = session: researcher
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Deep research on: {topic}
|
||||
|
||||
Find:
|
||||
- Current state of the art
|
||||
- Recent developments (last 6 months)
|
||||
- Key players and their positions
|
||||
- Statistics and data points
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
competitive_landscape = session: researcher
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Competitive/comparative research on: {topic}
|
||||
|
||||
Find:
|
||||
- Alternative approaches or solutions
|
||||
- Pros and cons of different options
|
||||
- What experts recommend
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
human_interest = session: researcher
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Human interest research on: {topic}
|
||||
|
||||
Find:
|
||||
- Real-world case studies
|
||||
- Success and failure stories
|
||||
- Quotes from practitioners
|
||||
- Surprising or counterintuitive findings
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 2: Synthesize research
|
||||
let research_synthesis = session "Synthesize all research"
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Combine all research into a unified brief:
|
||||
1. Key thesis/angle for the article
|
||||
2. Supporting evidence ranked by strength
|
||||
3. Narrative arc suggestion
|
||||
4. Potential hooks and headlines
|
||||
|
||||
Target audience: {audience}
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: { core_research, competitive_landscape, human_interest }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 3: Write first draft
|
||||
let draft = session: writer
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Write a blog post on: {topic}
|
||||
|
||||
Target: {audience}
|
||||
Length: 1500-2000 words
|
||||
Structure: Hook, context, main points, examples, conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
Use the research provided. Cite sources where appropriate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: research_synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 4: Editorial loop
|
||||
session: editor
|
||||
prompt: "Beginning editorial review. I'll track revisions."
|
||||
|
||||
loop until **the article meets publication standards** (max: 4):
|
||||
let critique = resume: editor
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Review this draft critically:
|
||||
1. What works well?
|
||||
2. What needs improvement?
|
||||
3. Specific suggestions (be actionable)
|
||||
4. Overall verdict: READY / NEEDS_REVISION
|
||||
|
||||
Be demanding but fair.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: draft
|
||||
|
||||
if **the article needs revision**:
|
||||
draft = session: writer
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Revise the article based on editorial feedback.
|
||||
Address each point specifically.
|
||||
Maintain what's working well.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: { draft, critique }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 5: Generate social media variants
|
||||
parallel:
|
||||
twitter_content = session: social-strategist
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Create Twitter/X content to promote this article:
|
||||
1. Main announcement tweet (punchy, with hook)
|
||||
2. 5-tweet thread extracting key insights
|
||||
3. 3 standalone insight tweets for later
|
||||
|
||||
Include placeholder for article link.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: draft
|
||||
|
||||
linkedin_post = session: social-strategist
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Create a LinkedIn post for this article:
|
||||
- Professional but not boring
|
||||
- Lead with insight, not announcement
|
||||
- 150-300 words
|
||||
- End with genuine question for engagement
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: draft
|
||||
|
||||
hn_submission = session: social-strategist
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Create Hacker News submission:
|
||||
- Title: factual, not clickbait, <80 chars
|
||||
- Suggested comment: genuine, adds context, not promotional
|
||||
|
||||
HN culture: technical, skeptical, hates marketing speak.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: draft
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 6: Package everything
|
||||
output article = draft
|
||||
output social = { twitter_content, linkedin_post, hn_submission }
|
||||
|
||||
resume: editor
|
||||
prompt: """
|
||||
Content Pipeline Complete!
|
||||
|
||||
Final package:
|
||||
1. Article: {draft length} words, {revision count} revisions
|
||||
2. Twitter: thread + standalone tweets
|
||||
3. LinkedIn: professional post
|
||||
4. HN: submission ready
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended publication order:
|
||||
1. Publish article
|
||||
2. HN submission (wait for feedback)
|
||||
3. Twitter thread
|
||||
4. LinkedIn (next business day AM)
|
||||
|
||||
All files saved to ./content-output/
|
||||
"""
|
||||
context: { draft, twitter_content, linkedin_post, hn_submission }
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user