fix: add serveBaseUrl to compactEmbeddedPiSession params
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Peter Steinberger
parent
1a47aec6e4
commit
f85807a2a6
101
skills/thebuilders-v2/templates/review-prompt.md
Normal file
101
skills/thebuilders-v2/templates/review-prompt.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
|
||||
# Script Review & Refinement
|
||||
|
||||
Review the following podcast script section by section and suggest improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
## Script to Review
|
||||
{{SCRIPT}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Each Section
|
||||
|
||||
For each section, provide:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Section [X]: [Name]
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Scores
|
||||
- Hook effectiveness: [X]/10
|
||||
- Fact density: [X]/10
|
||||
- Natural dialogue: [X]/10
|
||||
- Voice consistency: [X]/10
|
||||
- Discovery moments: [X]/10
|
||||
|
||||
### What Works
|
||||
- [Specific strength]
|
||||
- [Another strength]
|
||||
|
||||
### Issues Found
|
||||
1. **[Issue type]**: [Specific problem]
|
||||
- Line: "[Quote the problematic line]"
|
||||
- Fix: "[Suggested replacement]"
|
||||
- Why: [Explanation]
|
||||
|
||||
2. **[Issue type]**: [Specific problem]
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
### Voice Check
|
||||
- Maya in-character: [Yes/No] - [Note if any slip]
|
||||
- James in-character: [Yes/No] - [Note if any slip]
|
||||
|
||||
### Missing Elements
|
||||
- [ ] [Something that should be added]
|
||||
- [ ] [Another missing element]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Issues to Check
|
||||
|
||||
### Dialogue Issues
|
||||
- Monologues (turns > 5 sentences)
|
||||
- Missing reactions ("Wait, really?")
|
||||
- Unnatural transitions
|
||||
- Both hosts saying same thing
|
||||
|
||||
### Voice Consistency
|
||||
- Maya being too strategic
|
||||
- James being too technical
|
||||
- Missing signature phrases
|
||||
- Tone shifts
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Issues
|
||||
- Unsourced claims
|
||||
- Vague numbers ("millions" vs "$4.2M")
|
||||
- Dated references
|
||||
- Missing "so what?"
|
||||
|
||||
### Engagement Issues
|
||||
- No discovery moments
|
||||
- No disagreements
|
||||
- Predictable flow
|
||||
- Weak transitions between sections
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Overall Quality
|
||||
|
||||
**Episode Grade:** [A/B/C]
|
||||
|
||||
**Strengths:**
|
||||
1. [Top strength]
|
||||
2. [Another strength]
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Fixes Needed:**
|
||||
1. [Must fix before TTS]
|
||||
2. [Another must-fix]
|
||||
|
||||
**Nice-to-Have Improvements:**
|
||||
1. [Would improve but not critical]
|
||||
2. [Another nice-to-have]
|
||||
|
||||
**Estimated Duration:** [X] minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready for TTS:** [Yes / No - needs revision]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
After review, provide the complete REVISED script with all fixes applied.
|
||||
Use the same format (section markers + Person tags).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user