# Script Review & Refinement

Review the following podcast script section by section and suggest improvements.

## Script to Review
{{SCRIPT}}

---

## Review Each Section

For each section, provide:

```markdown
## Section [X]: [Name]

### Quality Scores
- Hook effectiveness: [X]/10
- Fact density: [X]/10
- Natural dialogue: [X]/10
- Voice consistency: [X]/10
- Discovery moments: [X]/10

### What Works
- [Specific strength]
- [Another strength]

### Issues Found
1. **[Issue type]**: [Specific problem]
   - Line: "[Quote the problematic line]"
   - Fix: "[Suggested replacement]"
   - Why: [Explanation]

2. **[Issue type]**: [Specific problem]
   ...

### Voice Check
- Maya in-character: [Yes/No] - [Note if any slip]
- James in-character: [Yes/No] - [Note if any slip]

### Missing Elements
- [ ] [Something that should be added]
- [ ] [Another missing element]
```

## Common Issues to Check

### Dialogue Issues
- Monologues (turns > 5 sentences)
- Missing reactions ("Wait, really?")
- Unnatural transitions
- Both hosts saying same thing

### Voice Consistency
- Maya being too strategic
- James being too technical
- Missing signature phrases
- Tone shifts

### Content Issues
- Unsourced claims
- Vague numbers ("millions" vs "$4.2M")
- Dated references
- Missing "so what?"

### Engagement Issues
- No discovery moments
- No disagreements
- Predictable flow
- Weak transitions between sections

---

## Final Assessment

```markdown
## Overall Quality

**Episode Grade:** [A/B/C]

**Strengths:**
1. [Top strength]
2. [Another strength]

**Critical Fixes Needed:**
1. [Must fix before TTS]
2. [Another must-fix]

**Nice-to-Have Improvements:**
1. [Would improve but not critical]
2. [Another nice-to-have]

**Estimated Duration:** [X] minutes

**Ready for TTS:** [Yes / No - needs revision]
```

## Output

After review, provide the complete REVISED script with all fixes applied.
Use the same format (section markers + Person tags).